Modern classrooms are not as modern as they should be as a result of the limited technology provided to faculty and students.
TESTS
WHO: Students and faculty who feel limited by the outdated resources set up in any given classroom setting; this could extend to other universities around the world
WHAT: The limitations of a given classroom in your typical university setting
WHY: Students and faculty deserve to be taught and to teach using the highest quality tools their site of education can provide; people pay money and spend time at these sites, thus being deserving consumers of only the best quality education
INTERVIEWS SUMMARY
The interviews I conducted allowed me to see past the traditional limitations of the average student (i.e. not having a writing utensil, paper to write on, etc.) and realize that this kind of problem can also include the very instructors of these students. In interviewing both of these sources (students and faculty), I was able to conclude that:
- Both groups agree that the lack of modern classroom tools limits their learning and teaching abilities.
- Students felt that there existed a direct relationship between their academic transformation and the efforts made by the university to ensure their academic success.
- Both students and teachers agreed that by bringing new technology into the classroom, collaboration would be further fostered.
- Faculty brought up the fact that in bringing in newer technology into the classroom, "distance students" could be easier to reach in terms of contributing to the physical space of the classroom setting and participate within classroom activities.
REFLECTION
Given the information I gathered through my interviews, I was able to learn about the vast issue that is the lack of modern technology in the average university classroom. It affects not only students but also faculty, who have to accurately teach hundreds of students using the outdated and restricting tools provided by the university. This opportunity has now expanded and can be applied to universities all over the world, of which I am sure face this very issue as well.
Great post my friend! I am a more conservative person I suppose and I believe that the old ways of textbooks and paper and pencils are not a bad way to teach and learn... I believe that it is all about the person way of learning. I have to agree that the interactive way of learning makes studying more fun...I also would like to add that students use a lot of technology such as computers and google and quizlet and many other tools there are available...
ReplyDeleteI might not agree but still great job!
I would ad that the codes for school are extremely expensive and there is a problem with technology and how much does it help students to learn...
I definitely agree that there is a need for refined and researched technological assistance, but the current "technology" in classrooms I have found to be ineffective and unnecessary. In addition, many students cannot connect to a computer screen the same way that one connects with a live teacher. I believe that if there was more research done to see the best way to incorporate technology with education, then it could definitely benefit the students.
ReplyDelete